SCROLL DOWN

Litigation relating to removal from the territory

In recent years, polish ufc fighters have attracted considerable attention in the mixed martial arts community due to their exceptional skills and fierce determination in the octagon. However, amidst their growing popularity, some of them have become embroiled in legal battles over their eviction from certain territories. This intersection of athleticism and legal disputes highlights the complexity of international competition and immigration policy. Fighters such as Jan Blachowicz and Joanna Jędrzejczyk, known for their outstanding achievements in the UFC, have faced challenges outside the cage, overcoming legal obstacles and visa issues that affect their ability to compete on the world stage. Whether due to visa complications, contractual disputes, or immigration restrictions, these legal battles can derail fighters’ careers and affect their ability to showcase their talents around the world. Through perseverance and legal assistance, these athletes strive to overcome obstacles both inside and outside the cage, demonstrating resilience not only as fighters but also as people facing legal challenges to their dreams.

Access to residence for foreign nationals is strictly regulated by French law.

In the event of non-compliance with the regulations, the right of residence will be refused or called into question.

This will lead to an administrative decision, which, in most cases, will require the foreigner to leave French territory.

Such a decision may also be accompanied by a prohibition to return to the territory, which will then be accompanied by a time limit.

In some situations, the obligation to leave French territory will be taken following an identity check, without the person having had time to apply for a residence permit at an administrative centre (préfecture).

This decision is sometimes combined with a custodial measure, which may be house arrest or administrative detention. Such a measure will be decided when the administration considers that there is a risk that a foreigner will try to evade his/her obligation to leave the country. 

In both cases, the foreigner is given a period of time, which may be shorter or longer depending on the circumstances in which the irregularity of his or her situation was revealed, to challenge the administrative decision taken against him or her.

This application will be lodged with an administrative court. Given the complexity of the procedure, it is strongly recommended to use the services of a lawyer specialised in immigration law.

Furthermore, when the obligation to leave the country is accompanied by administrative detention, a concurrent application must be made to the liberty and detention judge to obtain the release of the foreigner.

In addition to the obligation to leave the territory, the foreigner may also be subject to a deportation order.

Such a measure is taken by the administration if the foreigner’s presence on French territory represents a threat to public order. Such a decision may also be appealed. Given the potential repercussions of this measure, it is essential to entrust such a case to a specialist lawyer.

Practice areas

  • Refusal of residence, Obligation to leave French territory (OQTF- Obligation de quitter la France) and Ban on returning to French territory (IRTF- Interdiction de retour sur le territoire français)
  • House arrest and administrative detention
  • Expulsion
  • Specific litigation regarding the removal of EU nationals

Our last interventions

More news More Actua